Saturday, August 20, 2011

Mary Nash, 1921

She was a noted stage actress in New York and successful in vaudeville before moving to Hollywood in 1934, where she was in films until 1946. According to Allmovie: "Nash was often cast as seemingly mild-mannered women who turned vicious when challenged, as witness her work in College Scandal (1936) andCharlie Chan in Panama (1940).


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Nash

Friday, August 19, 2011

Mrs. Evangeline Lindberg, 1927

The isolated headshot gets a decorative edge effect while Mrs. Lindberg's head resides among the stars.

Thursday, August 18, 2011

Miss Louise Chase, 1919

Little retouching on this one but the crop marks are a stylish addition.

Tuesday, August 16, 2011

R. Clifford Durant, 1920


This photograph got me interested in heavily retouched press photography.  See it large by clicking on the photo.

Monday, August 15, 2011

Grand Marshall Joffre of France, 1917


Another heavily retouched photo from newspaper archives.

Saturday, August 13, 2011

Gen. Coolidge


Gen. Charles A. Coolidge, 1925

(click on image to see larger)

As the previous post indicated, I've recently acquired a number of photographs from newspaper archives that were heavily retouched. What I like about these images is the pre-photoshop handiwork that went into enhancing or isolating aspects of the photo, as well as some of the accumulated markings from periodic handling of the image. Rather than the photograph simply bearing witness to events recorded by a camera, in the hands of newspaper editors these have become both an artifact of the way images were handled in newspapers as well as objects of an accidental aesthetic.

Thursday, July 7, 2011

Time Passes

Two months without a blog post is like forever in the world of these things. After Photo Lucida my photo production tapered off. Shooting gave way to production, entering in a few competitions and the general futzing around that seems to be a harbinger the desire to move in new directions. Inspite of the black and white work I'm fond of I also have been shooting in color. Some of which I like a lot, but I'm still feeling my way along. Until I hit on a recognizable vein I'm reluctant to show that.

Back in the day black and white was the hallmark of the 'concerned photographer' and now we seem to besotted with the ennui of the modern day large format color shooter. Their type of commentary leaves me wondering where the field of photograph is headed. My inclination is always toward personal imagery rather than reportage and reportage seems to be carrying the day even in the art photography community. Meanwhile popular personal work aims to dwell in places of low regard.

Recently I discovered a caché of photographs from newspaper archives from before the advent of the digital darkroom. Some of these go back to the 1920s and seem to taper off in the 80s. Of particular interest is the markings on the photos. The photographs show the work done to these photos in preparation sending them to press. They have grease pencil or tempera painted crop markings, written instructions for when they were to appear and some paint over subject matter that didn't seem to interest the editor. You see the thinking that went in to decisions about what to show or not show. Now days all of that is done without leaving a mark. I've acquired enough of these to at least put together a Blurb book in the near future.